----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tim Flink" <tfl...@redhat.com> > To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 1:53:56 AM > Subject: Packaging for Fedora > > After a bit of miscommunication, I think we're finally on the same page > as Infra in terms of getting QA tools packaged. > > I've made a commitment to have everything packaged in Fedora before > F25. In return, they've agreed to let us continue to update the infra > repo with non-koji-built RPMs until that time. >
Sounds good. Thanks for communicating that with the infra folks. > Even though it's not as immediate of an issue anymore, I still want to > start making progress on this instead of waiting until the last minute; > there are plenty of things to package and it's still going to take > time to get done. > > The biggest problem I see is the 777 dirs in the libtaskotron package. > I've proposed two solutions in that ticket [1] but more input (and/or > solutions) would be more than welcome. > Replied in the ticket. > I've requested a qadevel-sig (the '-sig' part is required) group in > pkgdb [2] to manage ACLs for the packages and be the default assignee in > bugzilla so we don't have to worry about who's the primary POC. > > This isn't a "drop whatever you're doing and fix this now" but let's > get it done so we can get rid of the copr and start working on other > things :) > > Tim > > > [1] https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T779 > [2] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5269 > > _______________________________________________ > qa-devel mailing list > qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > _______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
