On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 10:12 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 14:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I'm back working on moving fedora-qa to Pagure. I'm now dealing with > > > the 'stats' scripts, and there's a problem: it appears that stats-bodhi > > > has never actually been properly licensed. It has no license header or > > > license text, and AFAICS, never has. I can't simply declare it to be > > > F/OSS licensed, as I didn't write it. > > > > > > Can Lukas or Kamil give us a license declaration for this code? Thanks! > > > > There's one other thing without an explicit license, leftover-tagged- > > builds.sh , which was written by Kamil. It's pretty trivial (and maybe > > no longer needed), but if you could declare a license that'd be good. > > I think putting GPL2+ on them is a reasonable choice.
Can you be a bit more definitive about stats-bodhi, since AFAICS, it was initially written by Lukas? I'm not sure the above is quite definitive enough for code that isn't entirely yours. > The leftover-tagged-builds.sh was I think written during some time > that we had a lot of issues with Bodhi. I'd probably still keep it > there, but yes, we haven't needed it lately. You should have commit access to the repo, so can you just stick a license line in the file for that one? Thanks :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
