On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 18:20 +0100, Josef Skladanka wrote: > I would try not to go the third way, because that is really prone to erros > IMO, and I'm not sure that "per context" is always right. So for me, the > "TCMS" part of the data, should be: > 1) testcases (with required fields/types of the fields in the "result > response" > 2) testplans - which testcases, possibly organized into groups. Maybe even > dependencies + saying "I need testcase X to pass, Y can be pass or warn, Z > can be whatever when A passes, for the testplan to pass" > > But this is fairly complex thing, to be honest, and it would be the first > and only useable TCMS in the world (from my point of view).
I have rather different opinions, actually...but I'm not working on this right now and I'd rather have something concrete to discuss than just opinions :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
