On Tue, 2017-05-09 at 15:25 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Dan Callaghan <dcall...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > My Factory 2.0 teammate Matt Jia, with some help from me, has been
> > working on getting Waiverdb deployed in Fedora infrastructure so that we
> > can start hooking things up to it.
> > 
> > (For anyone who hasn't heard of Waiverdb before, it is a service for
> > recording waivers against test results in ResultsDB. More info at
> > https://pagure.io/waiverdb and in the Focus Doc at
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Factory2/Focus/WaiverDB).
> > 
> > We would like to request a FAS group be given access to run waiverdb
> > playbooks in stage/prod using rbac-playbook, so that we don't have to
> > keep bugging Ralph for everything. :-) Our first idea was to re-use the
> > `sysadmin-qa` group for this.
> > 
> > I have a bit of experience with using rbac-playbook myself, for the
> > Beaker playbooks, and I'm assuming that ResultsDB and other related
> > services are also set up the same way with `sysadmin-qa`. So I think it
> > makes sense to do the same with Waiverdb.
> > 
> > How does that sound to the Fedora QA team?
> > 
> 
> It sounds good to me, more helping hands are always welcome :-)

No objection here either. Note sysadmin-qa membership also grants admin
rights to the openQA deployments, I believe; if anyone's interested in
learning how to look after those, feel free to poke me.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to