On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 05:37:03 -0400 Harold Dost <haroldd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Assuming that the schema [1] is correct, there should be no personal > or secret information. Though it would be good to validate that there > aren't any unexpected tables. > > [1]:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoQA_resultsdb_schema That schema was correct in the past but has not been kept up to date AFAIK. That being said, none of the changes I can think of would cause a problem in making the database dump public. Tim _______________________________________ > > Harold Dost | @hdost > > > > > On Sep 25, 2017 01:30, "Dan Callaghan" <dcall...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Is there any objection to making the ResultsDB database dumps public > under https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/db-dumps/ ? > > I wanted to grab a database dump today, to populate a local database > for development purposes. I was able to scp it from db-qa02 since I'm > in sysadmin-qa, but I figured it would be nice to have it available > publicly alongside those other applications' db dumps. > > I can't think of any reason why the ResultsDB dumps need to be kept > secret. There should be no sensitive data in them, right? > > So if there are no objections I'll file an infra ticket for adding the > dumps into the public-db-copy script. > > -- > Dan Callaghan <dcall...@redhat.com> > Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations > Red Hat > > _______________________________________________ > qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
pgp0RrsAS3Wtm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
