On 11/16/20 8:25 AM, František Zatloukal wrote:
Note: The email subject should have said "retiring" instead of
"orphaning".
There is little reason to orphan them, retiring is the right approach here.
Perhaps except for mongoquery, somebody else could be interested in
maintaining that, so that one should be orphaned instead.
The "correct" way to do this is to use orphaning procedure. This way, anybody
interested will have enough time to take over the to-be removed packages.
Also, all packages that are orphaned for 6+ weeks get retired. This will happen
before F34, so there is no harm in doing this through orphans.
Actually, if nothing requires it and it is upstream dead, retiring directly is
fine. So is orphaning I guess.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
