On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Amir E. Aharoni < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I committed > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/81246/ > > It basically repeats the same tests for logged in and for anon users. > Is there a more robust way to do it? > There probably is. As you may recall, I wrote these tests very quickly back in May based on information that we had at that time from Runa. She had devoted significant effort to checking that features were enabled and disabled properly for anonymous users and for logged-in users, so the tests cover both conditions in great detail. Now that ULS is more mature it might make sense to make the tests shorter and spend less detail on parity for anonymous and logged-in users. Should we open a Bugzilla ticket to refactor ULS tests for duplication between anonymous and logged-in users? -Chris > > -- > Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי > http://aharoni.wordpress.com > “We're living in pieces, > I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore > _______________________________________________ > QA mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa >
_______________________________________________ QA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
