Let me discuss these points with Chris, as I'm not sure how he wants me to proceed with regards to testing ULS . He mentioned waiting until the ULS code is more stable and sorted out before testing it. However, I'm glad we started communication on this issue so you know what we have been working on in the QA group as far as VE scripts, and we can sync up our efforts more in the future.
--Rachel *Gnome FOSS Outreach Program for Women Intern Browser Test Automation, Wikimedia Foundation* Notes from the Bleeding Edge <http://www.bleededge.blogspot.com/> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:06 PM, James Forrester <[email protected]>wrote: > On 29 August 2013 06:52, Rachel Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> James- I'm still working on some tests for Visual Editor now. I'm >> currently testing the bullets, numbering, indents and outdents. Maybe I >> should try and coordinate with your team regarding what tests I have done >> already and what I should do next? I'm not sure what the plan is for the >> VE repo or the VE tests, but I think it would be worth discussing it with >> you, Chris and Zeljko, and perhaps members of your team, as I have seen >> some conflicting information. >> > > That'd be really great, yes. Right now our "pain areas" are reliably > inserting and deleting text in paragraphs and lists, splitting them, and > copy-pasting them, in "complex" scripts (non-latin and non-Cyrillic, > mostly). Some of this starts to touch on native- and ULS-based Input Method > Editors, which are terribly complex (and horrible to test), but getting a > start would be great. > > J. > -- > James D. Forrester > Product Manager, VisualEditor > Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. > > [email protected] | @jdforrester > > _______________________________________________ > QA mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa > >
_______________________________________________ QA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
