>From Zeljko's gerrit code, it looks like he already removed the production tests. I was going to say that it could be still valuable to run them. There may be a time when test2 is not updated correctly with the right versions of features that we want to test, or is down for maintenance, and it would be a good idea to have a backup test running on production server. Also, those tests do not seem to be ones that would take a lot of time or horsepower to run, so it wouldn't be much overhead to run those.
--Rachel *Gnome FOSS Outreach Program for Women Intern Browser Test Automation, Wikimedia Foundation* Notes from the Bleeding Edge <http://www.bleededge.blogspot.com/> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Željko Filipin <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Chris McMahon <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Open question: is it worthwhile to run read-only browser tests against >> the production wiki, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org? >> > > I did some cleanup on how tests run. Feel free to comment here or in > Gerrit: > > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/85098/ > > Željko > > _______________________________________________ > QA mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa > >
_______________________________________________ QA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
