On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Rachel Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> How about mediawiki-selenium-library ? > We should conform to the sort of conventions we see at https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/admin/projects/ and (the same repos, but less easy to read at this level) https://github.com/wikimedia > > > --Rachel > > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Chris McMahon <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Željko Filipin <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Željko Filipin >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Is mediawiki-selenium a good name for the repository and Ruby gem? >>> Anybody has another idea? It does not have to be a good idea, any old idea >>> will do. :) >>> >>> >> >> I think it is. Looking at the /mediawiki source tree, /mediawiki/vagrant >> would be a similar repo. The alternative would be >> mediawiki/tools/selenium, but I prefer /mediawiki/selenium. >> >> -Chris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> QA mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > QA mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa > >
_______________________________________________ QA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
