On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Jeff Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
> What I'm wondering is whether or not it might be a good idea to use the > page-object "wait_until" method more widely. For example, we currently use > it in > aftv5_steps.rb<https://github.com/wikimedia/qa-browsertests/blob/master/features/step_definitions/aftv5_steps.rb> > . > > I realize that adding any type of sleep or wait behavior to a test just > causes overall test execution time to increase, but I'm thinking it's more > important to have fewer failing tests overall, so that folks can focus > their trouble-shooting efforts on test failures that may be a consequence > of actual bugs (and not just timeouts) > I agree with you that making tests robust[1][2] is more important than making them fast. Željko -- 1: http://watirwebdriver.com/waiting/ 2: https://github.com/cheezy/page-object/wiki/Ajax-Calls
_______________________________________________ QA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
