On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Greg Grossmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > > <quote name="Brian Gerstle" date="2015-11-16" time="11:39:32 -0500"> > > Is that because nobody has expressed interest in using it, or we > > specifically don't want people to use it? > > Reasoning is basically: Why would we encourage the use of a sub-par wiki > that is more hidden from our users/community/other staff developers than > our usual places of work (eg mw.org)? :) > I agree. BTW, in that vein there are some ways in which we could improve the integration of Phabricator with our own wikis, e.g. by adding the ability to reuse images from Commons on Phabricator <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T116515> (also to encourage people to upload illustrations to Commons during development already, so that they can be reused directly on the wikis afterwards, for user documentation and organizational reports) , and by auto-updating the status of tasks in "Tracked" templates <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Tracked>.
-- Tilman Bayer Senior Analyst Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB
_______________________________________________ QA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
