On Wed, Apr 9, 2014, at 10:21, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/9/14 9:17 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > as reported on the dev list we had a build issue on Linux and rebuild > > currently the Linux packages on the same revision. I am not subscribed to the dev list, sorry.
> but maybe I should explain the vote in more detail. At Apache only the > src release is relevant and that is for what we vote. IMHO this clarification should be explicitly stated at cwiki download page. > We as end-user product provide binaries because that is more relevant > for our users who are not able to build the product on their own. > > If somebody votes it is a god idea to add some info what have been > tested, e.g building the src release from scratch, testing the binary > only, ... I tested Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
