Hi Herbert, Jan, all Alternatively the name of the installer could be improved to >>> >>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_1600883.exe >>>> (i.e. with the revision number appended) >>>> and this would solve the problem of overwriting previous builds as well >>>> as >>>> allowing the tester to keep track of which installer is which... >>>> >>>> >>> A great idea but I'm afraid I can't help with this. Volunteers are >>> invited. >>> >> > Rereading Pedro's request I saw that we already do this, e.g. our latest > successful win-nightly build produced [1] three files with such names. > > [1] http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7/builds/50/steps/mv% > 20install%20bits%20to%20web/logs/stdio
You are right. It's the extracted install folder that doesn't keep the revision number. Sorry for the confusion. This means that all it takes to keep the previous version is to make sure it is not deleted if compiling a new one fails (i.e. deleting only after success instead of deleting before compile starts) Thanks! Pedro
