Hi Andrea, all I just installed RC2 and noticed that it is not bundled with the latest version of the dictionaries (English and Portuguese at least). If I check for Extension Updates the latest version is available for update.
The installer should include the latest version of bundled extensions. Cheers, Pedro On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Andrea Pescetti <[email protected]> wrote: > As a small gift for the 15 years of OpenOffice (OpenOffice was released as > Open Source on 13 October 2000, as Louis reminded us during ApacheCon > Budapest), we now have OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2 available. > > OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC1 has been tested for more than a week without major > bugs or regressions reported. Almost all relevant issues were tested and > verified fixed, even though we still need help with some. > > Note that, since there is still some delay for building and uploading, RC2 > is current as of revision 1707648 (last accepted commit, see > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/tags/ for the SNAPSHOT change), > so 4 days ago. > > A few reported bugs on RC1: > - RC1 was missing Linux 64-bit DEB packages and had some incorrect scripts > for source checksums; these are now fixed. > - https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126305 additional patches > were needed, these are in RC2 > - Windows installation: a user reported "Installation aborted with the > message that I lack access to registry". See http://s.apache.org/Z6v and > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126587 ; RC2 should not have > any changes in this respect, but possibly Windows users can > explain/check/guide. > - https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=107619 is not completely > solved, a fix came when RC2 was already being prepared and it is not > included > - Several release blockers were addressed (Bugzilla link below) > > RC2 can be downloaded from > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/ > open "binaries", then the language code, then you will find installers. If > you can't download it now, it means it is still synchronizing, try again in > a few hours. > > For QA, the link to use for verifying "release blocker" bugfixes is this > one (you will need a Bugzilla account to see it and to verify bugfixes): > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&list_id=170710&namedcmd=4.1.2_approved_and_fixed&remaction=run&sharer_id=7 > > Only the issues marked as RESOLVED FIXED are still to be checked. If you > verify that everything works as expected, please mark the issue as VERIFIED > FIXED (or post a comment, specifying your Operating System and language). > It is fine and useful to have two independent verifications of a bug, > especially on two different operating systems. > > Remember: testing is important since 4.1.2-RC2 can be a release we > actually vote upon. We are seeing a few release blocker requests coming in > but I'll wait that everything is properly tested before seeing whether this > deserves a RC3. So if you didn't test RC1, please test RC2; you can > actually use it for day-to-day tasks too for a few days, for more realistic > testing. > > Replies to the QA list only, if possible, thanks. > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
