On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 18/10/2015 Pedro Lino wrote: > >> RC1 was >> AOO412m1(Build:9780) - Rev. 1705625 >> 2015-09-28 12:45:04 (Mo, 28 Sep 2015) >> >> and RC2 is >> AOO412m2(Build:9781) - Rev. 1707648 >> 2015-09-28 12:45:04 (Mo, 28 Sep 2015) >> >> The date/time is the same. Is this expected or is it a Bug? >> > > It isn't expected. So it's a bug, thank you. Not a real bug in the code > since it depends on the build environment, but we may want to recheck it > for the RC3 build. In my system it is correct: > > AOO412m2(Build:9781) - Rev. 1707648 > 2015-10-09 09:35 - Linux x86_64 > > Are you using the Windows build? Since this depends on the build > environment, it is system-specific. Yes, I am. In fact I believe that is another bug/missing feature. It doesn't make sense that the second line in the AOO About box (apparently only under Windows) is the date in two different formats but fails to report what the platform is (which version of Windows and if the OS is 32 or 64 bits). The fact that the About information misses this information forces people (particularly in QA) to have to ask when it should be obvious (in fact it is obvious in the information you pasted from Linux) Regards, Pedro
