I am using Urmi's message just as a reminder about a question that has been in 
the back of my mind.

When students and others come here to work on QA, what is it QA is thought to 
be?

So, what do those who have asked to be part of the QA operations here regard as 
what they are called upon to do and what skills are to be demonstrated?

I'm asking because, normally, QA is not about making fixes.  

Quick fixes and simple fixes are generally what we think of as something a 
developer that is new to the project could start with in making contributions 
to the code.

QA encompasses rather different areas.  Identifying a defect in the code and 
even preparing a tested patch can and has happened.  Yet, as welcome as that 
is, it is not, in my mind, what QA is about.  In particular, much QA requires 
an understanding of the product, but not of its code.

I am not making reference to the use of QA as a meta-activity related to the 
quality and repeatability of a development and delivery process.

I am thinking of QA for AOO as an activity that is involved with confirming 
reported defects, obtaining sufficient precision and reproducibility to ensure 
that different defects/symptoms are not being confused together, and then to 
verify that a repair, if produced, actually cures the defect that is reported.  
This activity can well isolate a defect and its occurrence so much that a 
developer can find a single or connected cause.  The person conducting the QA 
might even do that.  I tend to think the QA person has put on a different hat 
when that happens.

Another aspect of QA is focused attention to the product that gives rise to 
defect reports, either in documentation, in product behavior, and also in 
product usability.  (This last is not regarded by some as a proper matter for 
QA, but that is a separate topic.)

I am not out to discourage anyone from finding fixes to reported defects, or 
even identifying defects on their own.  I just want some clarity on what those 
who have asked be part of QA here how they see what their contribution is.

 - Dennis


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Urmi Shah [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 11:34
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Assign Defect Reports
> 
> Hello,
> I am fairly comfortable with the process now. Can you please assign a
> set of defect reports to me?
> Thank you,
> Urmi Shah


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to