If there is any hope of qbs being developed further there needs to be a design philosophy document from current maintainer.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:57 PM Timur Kristóf <timur.kris...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 20:45 +1300, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > > > > > Qbs is open source but the largest part of development has always > > > been > > > shouldered by The Qt Company and the decision processes have never > > > been open > > > and transparent. > > > > It looks to me a bit early to make some plan, give people enough time > > to digest this. > > I'd like to know if the decision to obsolete Qbs is final, or is there > a chance that you guys might still change your mind? > > Taking a look at the blog bost I see a lot of salty comments coming > from Qbs users. > > Still, I'd be happy to continue using Qbs too, if it's maintained by > the community. Kudos to Richard for starting this thread. > > Best regards, > Tim > > _______________________________________________ > Qbs mailing list > Qbs@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qbs >
_______________________________________________ Qbs mailing list Qbs@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qbs
