02.10.2017 18:38, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/02/2017 09:39 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all. Here is a continuation of my "new backup architecture" series,
The very first part, but it is meaningful itself.
01: was previously sent in other my series, but here is more correct
version, one mistake is fixed.
02: only rebased to new byte-based interfaces (by Eric), r-bs saved
Presumably, that means we need to tell patchew:
Based-on:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-09/msg06848.html
[PATCH v10 00/20] make dirty-bitmap byte-based
Yes, surely, I forgot to note it.
03: changed to use hbitmap_next_zero, also a comment added to
none-mode (Fam)
04: commit message rewritten. The patch was controversial, but I need
it for further backup enhancement, so, let's continue the
discussion.
05: rebased, logic is not changed, r-bs saved
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (5):
hbitmap: add next_zero function
backup: move from done_bitmap to copy_bitmap
backup: init copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap for incremental
backup: simplify non-dirty bits progress processing
backup: use copy_bitmap in incremental backup
include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 1 +
include/qemu/hbitmap.h | 8 +++
block/backup.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
block/dirty-bitmap.c | 5 ++
util/hbitmap.c | 29 +++++++++++
5 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
