On 06/05/2015 14:20, Fam Zheng wrote: >> > >> > Does non-dataplane need to do anything, since it uses iohandlers rather >> > than aio_set_event_notifier_handler? > I guess it's not for this specific bug. See this as an attempt on a general > purpose "pause" mechanism to the device in investment for the future, for > example, bdrv_aio_drain. ;-) > > I can drop it in v2 if you think the idea is not very helpful.
It's slightly more complicated but I think it's worth the extra coverage testing that this provides. Paolo
