On Thu, 10/22 10:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 22/10/2015 10:31, Peter Lieven wrote:
> > 
> > +    switch (sense->key) {
> > +    case SCSI_SENSE_NO_SENSE:
> > +        return 0;
> > +        break;
> > +    case SCSI_SENSE_NOT_READY:
> > +        return -EBUSY;
> > +        break;
> > +    case SCSI_SENSE_DATA_PROTECTION:
> > +        return -EACCES;
> 
> Probably EPERM, not EACCES.

The comment of bdrv_write says -EACCES for read-only device, shoudn't this be
the same?

Fam

Reply via email to