On Thu, 10/22 10:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 22/10/2015 10:31, Peter Lieven wrote: > > > > + switch (sense->key) { > > + case SCSI_SENSE_NO_SENSE: > > + return 0; > > + break; > > + case SCSI_SENSE_NOT_READY: > > + return -EBUSY; > > + break; > > + case SCSI_SENSE_DATA_PROTECTION: > > + return -EACCES; > > Probably EPERM, not EACCES.
The comment of bdrv_write says -EACCES for read-only device, shoudn't this be the same? Fam