Am 27.10.2015 um 03:26 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > On 10/26/2015 05:45 PM, John Snow wrote: > > Reported-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> > > --- > > qemu-io-cmds.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/qemu-io-cmds.c b/qemu-io-cmds.c > > index 44d24e8..92c6b87 100644 > > --- a/qemu-io-cmds.c > > +++ b/qemu-io-cmds.c > > @@ -146,6 +146,21 @@ static int64_t cvtnum(const char *s) > > return ret; > > } > > > > +static void print_cvtnum_err(int64_t rc, const char *arg) > > +{ > > + switch (rc) { > > + case -EINVAL: > > + printf("Parsing error: non-numeric argument," > > + " or extraneous/unrecognized suffix -- %s\n", arg); > > + break; > > + case -ERANGE: > > + printf("Parsing error: argument too large -- %s\n", arg); > > + break; > > + default: > > + printf("Parsing error -- %s\n", arg); > > I still think ':' is better than ' --' in error messages, but I'll leave > it up to the maintainer.
This isn't important enough for a maintainer decision - if this isn't something that the patch submitter can decide by himself, what else would be left? In particular because the patch only retains the existing format. I'm happy to merge a patch that uses colons instead, but I won't reject anything just because it doesn't do the conversion. Kevin
pgp5NcMWTkGXm.pgp
Description: PGP signature