On 24.02.2016 19:23, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 24.02.2016 um 18:54 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> On 23.02.2016 18:16, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Now that we can use drive_add to create new nodes without a BB, we also
>>> want to be able to delete such nodes again.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> blockdev.c | 9 +++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
>>> index 3f46bc1..b76b6cd 100644
>>> --- a/blockdev.c
>>> +++ b/blockdev.c
>>> @@ -2816,6 +2816,15 @@ void hmp_drive_del(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
>>> AioContext *aio_context;
>>> Error *local_err = NULL;
>>>
>>> + bs = bdrv_find_node(id);
>>> + if (bs) {
>>> + qmp_x_blockdev_del(false, NULL, true, id, &local_err);
>>> + if (local_err) {
>>> + error_report_err(local_err);
>>> + }
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> blk = blk_by_name(id);
>>> if (!blk) {
>>> error_report("Device '%s' not found", id);
>>>
>>
>> It's a bit strange to require the user to specify the node name using
>> "node-name" for drive_add, but the to use "id" in drive_del; especially
>> because x-blockdev-del uses "node-name", too.
>
> Not sure I understand. For the user of drive_del that's simply a
> positional parameter, so they use neither "id" nor "node-name". Am I
> missing something?No, it's just me being confused again by the way HMP works. I keep forgetting that the user doesn't specify the parameter names. So the R-b stands. :-) Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
