On 02/03/2023 22:40, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:

We always follow the same pattern when registering
non-coalesced portio:

   - portio_list_init()
   - portio_list_add()

Factor these 2 operations in a single helper named
portio_list_register(). Since both calls become local
to ioport.c, reduce their scope by declaring them static.

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230207234615.77300-3-phi...@linaro.org>
---
  hw/audio/adlib.c        |  4 ++--
  hw/display/vga.c        |  4 ++--
  hw/dma/i82374.c         |  7 +++----
  hw/ide/ioport.c         |  9 ++++-----
  hw/isa/isa-bus.c        |  5 ++---
  hw/watchdog/wdt_ib700.c |  4 ++--
  include/exec/ioport.h   | 10 ++++------
  softmmu/ioport.c        | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
  8 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/audio/adlib.c b/hw/audio/adlib.c
index 5f979b1487..cc03c99306 100644
--- a/hw/audio/adlib.c
+++ b/hw/audio/adlib.c
@@ -291,8 +291,8 @@ static void adlib_realizefn (DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
adlib_portio_list[0].offset = s->port;
      adlib_portio_list[1].offset = s->port + 8;
-    portio_list_init (&s->port_list, OBJECT(s), adlib_portio_list, s, "adlib");
-    portio_list_add (&s->port_list, isa_address_space_io(&s->parent_obj), 0);
+    portio_list_register(&s->port_list, OBJECT(s), adlib_portio_list, s,
+                         "adlib", isa_address_space_io(&s->parent_obj), 0);
  }
static Property adlib_properties[] = {
diff --git a/hw/display/vga.c b/hw/display/vga.c
index 98d644922e..aa899fddc3 100644
--- a/hw/display/vga.c
+++ b/hw/display/vga.c
@@ -2313,7 +2313,7 @@ void vga_init(VGACommonState *s, Object *obj, 
MemoryRegion *address_space,
                                               s, "vga", address_space_io, 
0x3b0);
      }
      if (vbe_ports) {
-        portio_list_init(&s->vbe_port_list, obj, vbe_ports, s, "vbe");
-        portio_list_add(&s->vbe_port_list, address_space_io, 0x1ce);
+        portio_list_register(&s->vbe_port_list, obj, vbe_ports, s,
+                             "vbe", address_space_io, 0x1ce);
      }
  }
diff --git a/hw/dma/i82374.c b/hw/dma/i82374.c
index 63734c22c9..aeca0e8323 100644
--- a/hw/dma/i82374.c
+++ b/hw/dma/i82374.c
@@ -131,10 +131,9 @@ static void i82374_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
      }
      i8257_dma_init(isa_bus, true);
- portio_list_init(&s->port_list, OBJECT(s), i82374_portio_list, s,
-                     "i82374");
-    portio_list_add(&s->port_list, isa_address_space_io(&s->parent_obj),
-                    s->iobase);
+    portio_list_register(&s->port_list, OBJECT(s), i82374_portio_list, s,
+                         "i82374", isa_address_space_io(&s->parent_obj),
+                         s->iobase);
memset(s->commands, 0, sizeof(s->commands));
  }
diff --git a/hw/ide/ioport.c b/hw/ide/ioport.c
index ed7957dbae..7a6f29955f 100644
--- a/hw/ide/ioport.c
+++ b/hw/ide/ioport.c
@@ -60,9 +60,8 @@ int ide_bus_init_ioport_isa(IDEBus *bus, ISADevice *dev,
  void ide_bus_init_ioport(IDEBus *bus, Object *owner, MemoryRegion *io,
                           int iobase, int iobase2)
  {
-    portio_list_init(&bus->portio_list, owner, ide_portio_list, bus, "ide");
-    portio_list_add(&bus->portio_list, io, iobase);
-
-    portio_list_init(&bus->portio2_list, owner, ide_portio2_list, bus, "ide");
-    portio_list_add(&bus->portio_list, io, iobase2);
+    portio_list_register(&bus->portio_list, owner, ide_portio_list,
+                         bus, "ide", io, iobase);
+    portio_list_register(&bus->portio2_list, owner, ide_portio2_list,
+                         bus, "ide", io, iobase2);
  }
diff --git a/hw/isa/isa-bus.c b/hw/isa/isa-bus.c
index 8e3ca3785e..087293108e 100644
--- a/hw/isa/isa-bus.c
+++ b/hw/isa/isa-bus.c
@@ -130,15 +130,14 @@ int isa_register_portio_list(ISADevice *dev,
                               void *opaque, const char *name)
  {
      assert(dev);
-    assert(piolist && !piolist->owner);
/* START is how we should treat DEV, regardless of the actual
         contents of the portio array.  This is how the old code
         actually handled e.g. the FDC device.  */
      isa_init_ioport(dev, start);
- portio_list_init(piolist, OBJECT(dev), pio_start, opaque, name);
-    portio_list_add(piolist, isa_address_space_io(dev), start);
+    portio_list_register(piolist, OBJECT(dev), pio_start, opaque, name,
+                         isa_address_space_io(dev), start);
return 0;
  }
diff --git a/hw/watchdog/wdt_ib700.c b/hw/watchdog/wdt_ib700.c
index b116c3a3aa..ac4f0be7d8 100644
--- a/hw/watchdog/wdt_ib700.c
+++ b/hw/watchdog/wdt_ib700.c
@@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ static void wdt_ib700_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
**errp)
s->timer = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, ib700_timer_expired, s); - portio_list_init(&s->port_list, OBJECT(s), wdt_portio_list, s, "ib700");
-    portio_list_add(&s->port_list, isa_address_space_io(&s->parent_obj), 0);
+    portio_list_register(&s->port_list, OBJECT(s), wdt_portio_list, s,
+                         "ib700", isa_address_space_io(&s->parent_obj), 0);
  }
static void wdt_ib700_reset(DeviceState *dev)
diff --git a/include/exec/ioport.h b/include/exec/ioport.h
index eb9882a3ee..ca44f269ea 100644
--- a/include/exec/ioport.h
+++ b/include/exec/ioport.h
@@ -62,17 +62,15 @@ typedef struct PortioList {
      bool flush_coalesced_mmio;
  } PortioList;
-void portio_list_init(PortioList *piolist, Object *owner,
-                      const struct MemoryRegionPortio *callbacks,
-                      void *opaque, const char *name);
+void portio_list_register(PortioList *piolist, Object *owner,
+                          const MemoryRegionPortio *callbacks,
+                          void *opaque, const char *name,
+                          MemoryRegion *mr, uint32_t offset);
  void portio_list_register_flush_coalesced(PortioList *piolist, Object *owner,
                                            const MemoryRegionPortio *callbacks,
                                            void *opaque, const char *name,
                                            MemoryRegion *mr, uint32_t offset);
  void portio_list_destroy(PortioList *piolist);
-void portio_list_add(PortioList *piolist,
-                     struct MemoryRegion *address_space,
-                     uint32_t addr);
  void portio_list_del(PortioList *piolist);
#endif /* IOPORT_H */
diff --git a/softmmu/ioport.c b/softmmu/ioport.c
index be0c920c5c..42d43f8b27 100644
--- a/softmmu/ioport.c
+++ b/softmmu/ioport.c
@@ -113,10 +113,9 @@ uint32_t cpu_inl(uint32_t addr)
      return val;
  }
-void portio_list_init(PortioList *piolist,
-                      Object *owner,
-                      const MemoryRegionPortio *callbacks,
-                      void *opaque, const char *name)
+static void portio_list_init(PortioList *piolist, Object *owner,
+                             const MemoryRegionPortio *callbacks,
+                             void *opaque, const char *name)
  {
      unsigned n = 0;
@@ -246,9 +245,8 @@ static void portio_list_add_1(PortioList *piolist,
      ++piolist->nr;
  }
-void portio_list_add(PortioList *piolist,
-                     MemoryRegion *address_space,
-                     uint32_t start)
+static void portio_list_add(PortioList *piolist, MemoryRegion *address_space,
+                            uint32_t start)
  {
      const MemoryRegionPortio *pio, *pio_start = piolist->ports;
      unsigned int off_low, off_high, off_last, count;
@@ -314,3 +312,12 @@ void portio_list_register_flush_coalesced(PortioList 
*piolist, Object *owner,
      do_portio_list_register(piolist, owner, callbacks,
                              opaque, name, mr, offset, true);
  }
+
+void portio_list_register(PortioList *piolist, Object *owner,
+                          const MemoryRegionPortio *callbacks,
+                          void *opaque, const char *name,
+                          MemoryRegion *mr, uint32_t offset)
+{
+    do_portio_list_register(piolist, owner, callbacks,
+                            opaque, name, mr, offset, false);
+}

Ah, and you beat me to it :) I'm not 100% sold on the previous patch, but this makes sense so:

Reviewed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk>


ATB,

Mark.

Reply via email to