On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 05:31:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 06:12:34PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > Fix: > > > > softmmu/physmem.c: In function > > ‘cpu_physical_memory_snapshot_and_clear_dirty’: > > softmmu/physmem.c:916:27: warning: declaration of ‘offset’ shadows a > > parameter [-Wshadow=compatible-local] > > 916 | unsigned long offset = page % DIRTY_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE; > > | ^~~~~~ > > softmmu/physmem.c:892:31: note: shadowed declaration is here > > 892 | (MemoryRegion *mr, hwaddr offset, hwaddr length, unsigned > > client) > > | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~ > > > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> > > --- > > RFC: Please double-check how 'offset' is used few lines later. > > I don't see an issue - those lines are in an outer scope, so won't > be accessing the 'offset' you've changed, they'll be the parameter > instead. If you want to sanity check though, presumably the asm > dissassembly for this method should be the same before/after this > change
(and if it didn't do so then it's a bug..) > > > --- > > softmmu/physmem.c | 10 +++++----- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> -- Peter Xu
