On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 07:20:30PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote: > vfio determines if rombar is explicitly enabled by inspecting QDict. > Inspecting QDict is not nice because QDict is untyped and depends on the > details on the external interface. Add an infrastructure to determine if > rombar is explicitly enabled to hw/pci. > > Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com> > --- > include/hw/pci/pci_device.h | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci_device.h b/include/hw/pci/pci_device.h > index d3dd0f64b273..7564e9536dbd 100644 > --- a/include/hw/pci/pci_device.h > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_device.h > @@ -205,6 +205,11 @@ static inline uint16_t pci_get_bdf(PCIDevice *dev) > return PCI_BUILD_BDF(pci_bus_num(pci_get_bus(dev)), dev->devfn); > } > > +static inline bool pci_rom_bar_explicitly_enabled(PCIDevice *dev) > +{ > + return dev->rom_bar > 0; > +} > +
I don't get it. rom_bar is uint32_t if it's set to "-1" is is still >0. How was this patchset tested? > uint16_t pci_requester_id(PCIDevice *dev); > > /* DMA access functions */ > > -- > 2.43.0