On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 6:52 PM Klaus Jensen <i...@irrelevant.dk> wrote: > > On Feb 15 14:44, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 12:44:00 +1000 > > Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > Just wanted to add that back in v2 Klaus Jensen stated: > > > > "I have no problem with picking this up for nvme, but I'd rather not take > > the full series through my tree without reviews/acks from the pci > > maintainers." > > > > So I'd like to add my request that Michael and/or Marcell takes a look > > when they have time. > > > > I've been carrying more or less the first 2 patches in my CXL staging > > tree for a couple of years (the initial Linux Kernel support that Lukas > > Wunner is now handling was developed against this) and I would love > > to see this upstream. Along with PCI and CXL and NVME usecases this > > is a major part of the Confidential Compute device assignment story > > via PCI/TDISP and CXL equivalent. > > > > It's not changed in significant ways since v2 back in October last year. > > > > Would someone be willing to sign up to maintain the spdm_socket backend?
I'm happy to and should have already edited MAINTAINERS to indicate that. I'll fix that up in the next version Alistair
