Am 15.03.2024 um 16:07 hat Stefano Garzarella geschrieben:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 03:03:31PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > VDUSE requires that virtqueues are first enabled before the DRIVER_OK
> > status flag is set; with the current API of the kernel module, it is
> > impossible to enable the opposite order in our block export code because
> > userspace is not notified when a virtqueue is enabled.
> >
> > This requirement also mathces the normal initialisation order as done by
> > the generic vhost code in QEMU. However, commit 6c482547 accidentally
> > changed the order for vdpa-dev and broke access to VDUSE devices with
> > this.
> >
> > This changes vdpa-dev to use the normal order again and use the standard
> > vhost callback .vhost_set_vring_enable for this. VDUSE devices can be
> > used with vdpa-dev again after this fix.
> >
> > vhost_net intentionally avoided enabling the vrings for vdpa and does
> > this manually later while it does enable them for other vhost backends.
> > Reflect this in the vhost_net code and return early for vdpa, so that
> > the behaviour doesn't change for this device.
> >
> > Cc: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org
> > Fixes: 6c4825476a4351530bcac17abab72295b75ffe98
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Actually make use of the @enable parameter
> > - Change vhost_net to preserve the current behaviour
> >
> > hw/net/vhost_net.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c | 5 +----
> > hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > hw/virtio/vhost.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/net/vhost_net.c b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> > index e8e1661646..fd1a93701a 100644
> > --- a/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> > +++ b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> > @@ -541,6 +541,16 @@ int vhost_set_vring_enable(NetClientState *nc, int
> > enable)
> > VHostNetState *net = get_vhost_net(nc);
> > const VhostOps *vhost_ops = net->dev.vhost_ops;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * vhost-vdpa network devices need to enable dataplane virtqueues after
> > + * DRIVER_OK, so they can recover device state before starting
> > dataplane.
> > + * Because of that, we don't enable virtqueues here and leave it to
> > + * net/vhost-vdpa.c.
> > + */
> > + if (nc->info->type == NET_CLIENT_DRIVER_VHOST_VDPA) {
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > nc->vring_enable = enable;
> >
> > if (vhost_ops && vhost_ops->vhost_set_vring_enable) {
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c b/hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c
> > index eb9ecea83b..13e87f06f6 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c
> > @@ -253,14 +253,11 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_device_start(VirtIODevice
> > *vdev, Error **errp)
> >
> > s->dev.acked_features = vdev->guest_features;
> >
> > - ret = vhost_dev_start(&s->dev, vdev, false);
> > + ret = vhost_dev_start(&s->dev, vdev, true);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Error starting vhost");
> > goto err_guest_notifiers;
> > }
> > - for (i = 0; i < s->dev.nvqs; ++i) {
> > - vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready(&s->vdpa, i);
> > - }
> > s->started = true;
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> > index ddae494ca8..401afac2f5 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> > @@ -886,12 +886,13 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_get_vq_index(struct vhost_dev
> > *dev, int idx)
> > return idx;
> > }
> >
> > -int vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready(struct vhost_vdpa *v, unsigned idx)
> > +static int vhost_vdpa_set_vring_enable_one(struct vhost_vdpa *v, unsigned
> > idx,
> > + int enable)
> > {
> > struct vhost_dev *dev = v->dev;
> > struct vhost_vring_state state = {
> > .index = idx,
> > - .num = 1,
> > + .num = enable,
> > };
> > int r = vhost_vdpa_call(dev, VHOST_VDPA_SET_VRING_ENABLE, &state);
> >
>
> After this line we now have:
>
> trace_vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready(dev, idx, r);
>
> Should we rename it or move it to the new function?
>
> If we rename it, we should trace also `enable`.
I think renaming is better so that we cover all code paths that enable a
vring. I'll change this and send a v3.
> > @@ -899,6 +900,27 @@ int vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready(struct vhost_vdpa
> > *v, unsigned idx)
> > return r;
> > }
> >
> > +static int vhost_vdpa_set_vring_enable(struct vhost_dev *dev, int enable)
> > +{
> > + struct vhost_vdpa *v = dev->opaque;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) {
> > + ret = vhost_vdpa_set_vring_enable_one(v, i, enable);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready(struct vhost_vdpa *v, unsigned idx)
> > +{
> > + return vhost_vdpa_set_vring_enable_one(v, idx, 1);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int vhost_vdpa_set_config_call(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> > int fd)
> > {
> > @@ -1514,6 +1536,7 @@ const VhostOps vdpa_ops = {
> > .vhost_set_features = vhost_vdpa_set_features,
> > .vhost_reset_device = vhost_vdpa_reset_device,
> > .vhost_get_vq_index = vhost_vdpa_get_vq_index,
> > + .vhost_set_vring_enable = vhost_vdpa_set_vring_enable,
> > .vhost_get_config = vhost_vdpa_get_config,
> > .vhost_set_config = vhost_vdpa_set_config,
> > .vhost_requires_shm_log = NULL,
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> > index 2c9ac79468..decfb85184 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> > @@ -1984,7 +1984,13 @@ static int vhost_dev_set_vring_enable(struct
> > vhost_dev *hdev, int enable)
> > return hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_set_vring_enable(hdev, enable);
> > }
> >
> > -/* Host notifiers must be enabled at this point. */
> > +/*
> > + * Host notifiers must be enabled at this point.
> > + *
> > + * If @vring is true, this function will enable all vrings before starting
> > the
>
> Nit: @vrings
Thanks, will fix.
> > + * device. If it is false, the vring initialization is left to be done by
> > the
> > + * caller.
> > + */
> > int vhost_dev_start(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev, bool vrings)
> > {
> > int i, r;
> > --
> > 2.44.0
> >
>
> The rest LGTM, but while reviewing I was thinking whether it would be
> better to split the patch into two: first patch to support
> .vhost_set_vring_enable() for vhost-vdpa, second patch to fix
> hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c.
>
> But I'm not sure this is a good idea since the second is strictly
> dependent on the first.
And the second part to be split off is really small, three lines removed
and one changed. I don't think it's worth it.
Kevin
