On 02.08.2016 02:12, John Snow wrote: > Key: > [----] : patches are identical > [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch > [down] : patch is downstream-only > The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, > respectively > > 001/10:[----] [-C] 'block: Hide HBitmap in block dirty bitmap interface' > 002/10:[----] [--] 'HBitmap: Introduce "meta" bitmap to track bit changes' > 003/10:[----] [--] 'tests: Add test code for meta bitmap' > 004/10:[0004] [FC] 'block: Support meta dirty bitmap' > 005/10:[----] [--] 'block: Add two dirty bitmap getters' > 006/10:[----] [--] 'block: Assert that bdrv_release_dirty_bitmap succeeded' > 007/10:[----] [--] 'hbitmap: serialization' > 008/10:[----] [-C] 'block: BdrvDirtyBitmap serialization interface' > 009/10:[----] [--] 'tests: Add test code for hbitmap serialization' > 010/10:[----] [--] 'block: More operations for meta dirty bitmap' > > === > v8: Hello, is it v8 you're looking for? > ===
Thanks, queued for 2.8: https://github.com/XanClic/qemu/commits/block-next (Any volunteers for a MAINTAINERS entry regarding the bitmap code? :-)) Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
