On 01.02.2017 22:55, Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Wed 01 Feb 2017 10:51:01 PM CET, Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> The assertion probably makes sense even for them, considering that >> size_t does not have a constant size. But I'm not entirely sold that >> the I/O vector creation is actually the place where the assertions >> belong. > > I was actually just reading virtio_blk_handle_request() and I see that > the I/O vector is initialized before the check for the maximum request > size that returns VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR. > > So you're probably right and it's safer not to add that assertion.
So... Apply patch 1 and hope we do everything right in the future? :-) Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
