Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> writes:
> Am 20.04.2017 um 17:30 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:00:03PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> > block/sheepdog.c | 1 +
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
>> > index fb9203e..7e889ee 100644
>> > --- a/block/sheepdog.c
>> > +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
>> > @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int connect_to_sdog(BDRVSheepdogState *s, Error
>> > **errp)
>> > qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
>> > } else {
>> > fd = -EIO;
>> > + error_setg(errp, "Failed to connect to sheepdog server");
>> > }
>>
>> This doesn't make much sense to me. The lines just above the
>> diff context have this:
>>
>> fd = socket_connect(s->addr, errp, NULL, NULL);
>>
>> socket_connect should have already reported an error on "errp"
>> in the scenario that 'fd == -1'.
>
> By the way, am I the only one who thinks that having errp anywhere else
> than as the last argument is bad style? I can easily see myself missing
> that this functions sets it because the last argument is NULL.
Yes, it's bad style because it's suprising. Worth fixing.
