We've been documenting the value in bytes since its introduction
in commit b9a9b3a4 (v1.3), where it was actually reported in bytes.

Commit e4654d2 (v2.0) then removed things from block/qapi.c, in
preparation for a rewrite to a list of dirty sectors in the next
commit 21b5683 in block.c, but the new code mistakenly started
reporting in sectors.

Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1441460

CC: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com>

---
Too late for 2.9, since the regression has been unnoticed for
nine releases. But worth putting in 2.9.1.

v2-v4: no change
---
 block/dirty-bitmap.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
index 543bddb..30462d4 100644
--- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c
+++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ BlockDirtyInfoList 
*bdrv_query_dirty_bitmaps(BlockDriverState *bs)
     QLIST_FOREACH(bm, &bs->dirty_bitmaps, list) {
         BlockDirtyInfo *info = g_new0(BlockDirtyInfo, 1);
         BlockDirtyInfoList *entry = g_new0(BlockDirtyInfoList, 1);
-        info->count = bdrv_get_dirty_count(bm);
+        info->count = bdrv_get_dirty_count(bm) << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
         info->granularity = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(bm);
         info->has_name = !!bm->name;
         info->name = g_strdup(bm->name);
-- 
2.9.4


Reply via email to