On 06/27/2017 02:24 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards > byte-based. In the common case, allocation is unlikely to ever use > values that are not naturally sector-aligned, but it is possible > that byte-based values will let us be more precise about allocation > at the end of an unaligned file that can do byte-based access. >
> --- > v2: rebase to earlier changes, tweak commit message > --- > include/block/block.h | 4 +-- > block/backup.c | 17 ++++--------- > block/commit.c | 21 +++++++--------- > block/io.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > block/stream.c | 5 ++-- > block/vvfat.c | 34 ++++++++++++++----------- Now that Kevin's branch is sitting on a bunch of vvfat changes (including reformatting to get rid of TABs), applying this will conflict. Do you need me to send a v4 to tackle the resolution? -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature