On 05/07/2017 16:21, Marc-André Lureau wrote: >> >> They are, but it's an implementation detail. Why is this patch necessary? > I didn't think this would be controversial :) well, the checks I added to > clang verify function pointer share the coroutine attribute. > > The function themself are/need to be coroutine_fn (as they will call > coroutine_fn too)
It's not controversial, I would not have expected the functions to call coroutine_fn. :) How do they do that? Paolo
