John Snow <js...@redhat.com> writes:

> On 08/07/2017 10:45 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Block dirty bitmaps represent granularity in bytes as uint32_t.  It
>> must be a power of two and a multiple of BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE.
>> 
>> The trouble with uint32_t is computations like this one in
>> mirror_do_read():
>> 
>>     uint64_t max_bytes;
>> 
>>     max_bytes = s->granularity * s->max_iov;
>> 
>> The operands of * are uint32_t and int, so the product is computed in
>> uint32_t (assuming 32 bit int), then zero-extended to uint64_t.
>> 
>> Since granularity is generally combined with 64 bit file offsets, it's
>> best to make it 64 bits, too.  Less opportunity to screw up.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
>
> [bweeooop]
>
>> --- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c
>> +++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
>
> [buuuuweeeep]
>
>> @@ -506,16 +506,11 @@ uint32_t 
>> bdrv_get_default_bitmap_granularity(BlockDriverState *bs)
>>      return granularity;
>>  }
>>  
>> -uint32_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(const BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
>> +uint64_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(const BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
>>  {
>>      return BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE << hbitmap_granularity(bitmap->bitmap);
>>  }
>>  
>> -uint32_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_meta_granularity(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
>> -{
>> -    return BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE << hbitmap_granularity(bitmap->meta);
>> -}
>
> Why? Unused? Not cool enough to mention?

I didn't feel like fixing an unused function, so I dropped it.  Can
mention this in the commit message.

Reply via email to