On 03/10/2017 11:57, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The condition of the for-loop makes sure that b is always smaller
> than s->blocks, so the "if (b >= s->blocks)" statement is completely
> superfluous here.
> 
> Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1715007
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/block/onenand.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/block/onenand.c b/hw/block/onenand.c
> index 30e40f3..de65c9e 100644
> --- a/hw/block/onenand.c
> +++ b/hw/block/onenand.c
> @@ -520,10 +520,6 @@ static void onenand_command(OneNANDState *s)
>          s->intstatus |= ONEN_INT;
>  
>          for (b = 0; b < s->blocks; b ++) {
> -            if (b >= s->blocks) {
> -                s->status |= ONEN_ERR_CMD;
> -                break;
> -            }
>              if (s->blockwp[b] == ONEN_LOCK_LOCKTIGHTEN)
>                  break;
>  
> 

Looks like a bad cut'n'paste from case 0x23.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>

Reply via email to