Am 10.11.2017 um 18:36 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > On 2017-11-10 10:16, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> writes: > > > >> bdrv_reopen_prepare() assumes that all BDS options are strings, which is > >> not necessarily correct. This series introduces a new qobject_is_equal() > >> function which can be used to test whether any options have changed, > >> independently of their type. > > > > Series looks ready to me. It touches QAPI to achieve its purpose in the > > block layer; I'd be fine with merging it via a block tree. > > Thanks! So now it's my problem to figure out whether this is 2.11 > material...? :-)
The test case in patch 5 segfaults without the series. Why would it not be a bug fix (= 2.11 material)? Kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
