Jeff, I think this ought to go through your tree, but I'll sign off on it. Fam: Do you agree?
(Probably -next material, but I'm sending this email because I'm taking it out of my review queue and I don't want it to get lost.) --js On 10/12/2017 09:53 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Hi all. Here is a continuation of my "new backup architecture" series, > The very first part, but it is meaningful itself. > > v2: rebase on master > 01: add test and fix bug > 02: move commit about NONE mode to this patch, add John's r-b (hope, > you are OK with this tiny change) > 03: tiny refactor (John) > 04: improve commit message, add John's r-b > 05: add John's r-b > > Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (5): > hbitmap: add next_zero function > backup: move from done_bitmap to copy_bitmap > backup: init copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap for incremental > backup: simplify non-dirty bits progress processing > backup: use copy_bitmap in incremental backup > > include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 1 + > include/qemu/hbitmap.h | 8 +++ > block/backup.c | 118 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > block/dirty-bitmap.c | 5 ++ > tests/test-hbitmap.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > util/hbitmap.c | 39 ++++++++++++++ > 6 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) >
