On 28/07/2017 14:54, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 09.07.2017 um 19:06 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben: >> The function vmdk_read_cid() can fail if the read on the underlying >> block device fails, or if there's a format error in the VMDK file. >> However its API doesn't provide a mechanism to report these errors, >> and in some cases we were returning a CID of 0 and in some cases a >> CID of 0xffffffff, either of which might potentially be valid values. >> >> Change the function to return 0 on success or a negative errno, and >> return the CID via a uint32_t* argument. Update the callsites to >> handle and propagate the error appropriately. >> >> This fixes in passing a Coverity-spotted issue (CID 1350038) where >> we weren't checking the return value from sscanf(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > > Fam, this is the commit that introduced the qemu-iotests 059 failure for > vmdk. I think what's happening is that we use an image produced by a > fuzzer, and with the additional checks introduced in this patch, we now > fail earlier and don't test the condition any more that we wanted to > test. > > So do we need a new version of sample_images/afl9.vmdk.bz2 that has a > valid CID?
This has never been fixed, has it? I still see the failure. Paolo
