On Tue 27 Feb 2018 05:29:42 PM CET, Eric Blake wrote: > Match our code to the spec change in the previous patch - there's > no reason for the refcount table to allow larger offsets than the > L1/L2 tables. In practice, no image has more than 64PB of > allocated clusters anyways, as anything beyond that can't be > expressed via L2 mappings to host offsets. > > Suggested-by: Alberto Garcia <be...@igalia.com> > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <be...@igalia.com> Berto
