On Wed, 02/28 19:05, Max Reitz wrote: > Add a function that wraps hbitmap_iter_next() and always calls it in > non-advancing mode first, and in advancing mode next. The result should > always be the same. > > By using this function everywhere we called hbitmap_iter_next() before, > we should get good test coverage for non-advancing hbitmap_iter_next().
Haha, clever!
