Hi, > Based on this proposal for layer 2, it looks like you expect the > number of keys used on layer 1 to become large. > > I would prefer a solution that expects a very small set of keys > for layer 0+1, and point to other specifications of how the blob > can be interpreted for each key. This way we can experiment with > different solutions for layers 2-4, instead of deciding on a > specific format like JSON.
Well, you never know what people will use this for ... cheers, Gerd