On 07.06.2018 13:18, Paolo Bonzini wrote: [...] > As to "-enable-kvm", I don't see anything wrong with users using it, or > even with occasionally adding more options like it. However, we should > warn developers that such simple options should be syntactic sugar for a > structured (i.e. QemuOpts-based) option like "-accel", and that it > should only be done for similarity with existing options. Honestly, in this case I think it's just confusing for the normal users, and not sugar (anymore). If I'm an unexperienced user who wants to enable KVM, and I see multiple options that seem to be related, I wonder whether they do the same or whether there's a difference, and which one is preferred. And "-accel kvm" is even less to type than "-enable-kvm", so there is really no advantage for "-enable-kvm" anymore. I think we should remove "-enable-kvm" and "-enable-hax" from qemu-doc.texi and only list it in the new legacy chapter / document.
Thomas
