On 11/09/2018 12:57 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 9/27/18 12:23 PM, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/26/2018 11:11 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> We need an accurate count of the number of bits set in a bitmap
>>> after a merge. In particular, since the merge operation short-circuits
>>> a merge from an empty source, if you have bitmaps A, B, and C where
>>> B started empty, then merge C into B, and B into A, an inaccurate
>>> count meant that A did not get the contents of C.
>>>
>
>>
>> OK, tests coming up. Thanks for the CC to stable.
>
> Did we ever add tests for this yet?
>
Running behind. Not yet. On my list.
