On 17 October 2018 at 10:51, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 04:20:18PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> Theoretically possible that we finish the skipping loop with bs = NULL
>> and the following code will crash trying to dereference it. Fix that.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com>
>> ---
>> migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
>> index 477826330c..6de808f95f 100644
>> --- a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
>> +++ b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
>> @@ -288,6 +288,10 @@ static int init_dirty_bitmap_migration(void)
>> bs = backing_bs(bs);
>> }
>>
>> + if (!bs || bs->implicit) {
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> for (bitmap = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next(bs, NULL); bitmap;
>> bitmap = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next(bs, bitmap))
>> {
>
> Previous discussion:
> http://qemu.11.n7.nabble.com/PATCH-migration-Appease-coverity-skip-empty-block-trees-td582504.html
>
> I've CCed John so he can take a look.
So have you block-layer folks figured out how you want to address
this Coverity issue yet?
thanks
-- PMM
