On 3/14/19 8:01 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com> writes:

On 3/8/19 2:14 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The previous commit added a way to configure firmware with -blockdev
rather than -drive if=pflash.  Document it as the preferred way.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
---
   docs/interop/firmware.json | 20 ++++++++++++++------
   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/interop/firmware.json b/docs/interop/firmware.json
index 28f9bc1591..ff8c2ce5f2 100644
--- a/docs/interop/firmware.json
+++ b/docs/interop/firmware.json
@@ -212,9 +212,13 @@
   #
   # @executable: Identifies the firmware executable. The firmware
   #              executable may be shared by multiple virtual machine
-#              definitions. The corresponding QEMU command line option
-#              is "-drive
-#              
if=pflash,unit=0,readonly=on,file=@executable.@filename,format=@executable.@format".
+#              definitions. The preferred corresponding QEMU command
+#              line options are
+#                  -drive 
if=none,id=pflash0,readonly=on,file=@executable.@filename,format=@executable.@format
+#                  -machine pflash0=pflash0

I have a question. How is libvirt supposed to query for this? How can
it learn it can use this new, preferred command line?

You can use qom-list-properties to find out whether the machine has
property pflash0.

---> {"execute": "qom-list-properties", "arguments": {"typename": 
"pc-q35-4.0-machine"}}
<--- {"return": [... {"name": "pflash0", ...} ...]}
---> {"execute": "qom-list-properties", "arguments": {"typename": 
"isapc-machine"}}
<--- {"return": [... no such property ...]}


Ah, very well, thank you.

Michal

Reply via email to