13.06.2019 18:16, Eric Blake wrote: > On 6/11/19 5:27 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: >> No reason to keep it separate, it differs from others block driver >> behavior and therefor confuses. Instead of generic > > s/therefor/therefore/ (both spellings are valid, but the former looks > archaic)
Interesting, for me it was just a mistake. > >> 'state = (State*)bs->opaque' we have to use special helper. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com> >> --- >> block/nbd.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-) >> > > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> > > I'm queuing this series through my NBD tree. > Thanks!! I'll rebase reconnect series on this. -- Best regards, Vladimir
