On 22/10/2019 13.39, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes: > >> On 22/10/2019 09.21, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> As discussed here: >>> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html >>> >>> and here: >>> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01388.html >>> >>> it would be good to have some more valuable iotests enabled in the >>> "auto" group to get better iotest coverage during "make check". >>> >>> And once Max' "iotests: Add and use $SOCK_DIR" patch series has been >>> merged, we can indeed enable these Python-based tests, too. >> >> Oh well, some Travis jobs are now running too long and hit the 50 >> minutes limit: >> >> https://travis-ci.com/huth/qemu/jobs/248158477 >> >> ... so we either might need to remove some other iotests from the "auto" >> group again, or change the Travis jobs to include less targets... >> >> That "clang + sanitizer" job was already running 45 minutes before my >> change, so it was already close to the limit. So I'd suggest to change >> it to include less targets. Opinions? > > Which one is clang with sanitizers? I think we only build softmmu for > gcc + sanitizer at the moment.
I meant this one here: - env: - CONFIG="--target-list=${MAIN_SOFTMMU_TARGETS} " compiler: clang before_script: - ./configure ${CONFIG} --extra-cflags="-fsanitize=undefined -Werror" || { cat config.log && exit 1; } Thomas