On 27.11.19 19:08, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Use bdrv_block_status_above to chose effective chunk size and to handle > zeroes effectively. > > This substitutes checking for just being allocated or not, and drops > old code path for it. Assistance by backup job is dropped too, as > caching block-status information is more difficult than just caching > is-allocated information in our dirty bitmap, and backup job is not > good place for this caching anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com> > --- > block/block-copy.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > block/trace-events | 1 + > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/block-copy.c b/block/block-copy.c > index 8602e2cae7..74295d93d5 100644 > --- a/block/block-copy.c > +++ b/block/block-copy.c
[...] > @@ -336,23 +375,25 @@ int coroutine_fn block_copy(BlockCopyState *s, > chunk_end = next_zero; > } > > - if (s->skip_unallocated) { > - ret = block_copy_reset_unallocated(s, start, &status_bytes); > - if (ret == 0) { > - trace_block_copy_skip_range(s, start, status_bytes); > - start += status_bytes; > - continue; > - } > - /* Clamp to known allocated region */ > - chunk_end = MIN(chunk_end, start + status_bytes); > + ret = block_copy_block_status(s, start, chunk_end - start, > + &status_bytes); > + if (s->skip_unallocated && !(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED)) { > + bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, start, status_bytes); > + s->progress_reset_callback(s->progress_opaque); > + trace_block_copy_skip_range(s, start, status_bytes); > + start += status_bytes; > + continue; > } > > + chunk_end = MIN(chunk_end, start + status_bytes); I’m not sure how much the old “Clamp to known allocated region” actually helps, but I wouldn’t drop it anyway. Apart from this nit, the patch looks good to me. Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature