On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:07:18PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:14:34PM +0200, Lukas Straub wrote: > > > Hello Everyone, > > > In many cases, if qemu has a network connection (qmp, migration, chardev, > > > etc.) > > > to some other server and that server dies or hangs, qemu hangs too. > > > > If qemu as a whole hangs due to a stalled network connection, that is a > > bug in QEMU that we should be fixing IMHO. QEMU should be doing non-blocking > > I/O in general, such that if the network connection or remote server stalls, > > we simply stop sending I/O - we shouldn't ever hang the QEMU process or main > > loop. > > > > There are places in QEMU code which are not well behaved in this respect, > > but many are, and others are getting fixed where found to be important. > > > > Arguably any place in QEMU code which can result in a hang of QEMU in the > > event of a stalled network should be considered a security flaw, because > > the network is untrusted in general. > > That's not really true of the 'management network' - people trust that > and I don't see a lot of the qemu code getting fixed safely for all of > them.
It depends on the user / app / deployment scenario. In OpenStack alot of work was done to beef up security between services on the mgmt network, with TLS encryption as standard to reduce attack vectors. > > > These patches introduce the new 'yank' out-of-band qmp command to recover > > > from > > > these kinds of hangs. The different subsystems register callbacks which > > > get > > > executed with the yank command. For example the callback can shutdown() a > > > socket. This is intended for the colo use-case, but it can be used for > > > other > > > things too of course. > > > > IIUC, invoking the "yank" command unconditionally kills every single > > network connection in QEMU that has registered with the "yank" subsystem. > > IMHO this is way too big of a hammer, even if we accept there are bugs in > > QEMU not handling stalled networking well. > > But isn't this hammer conditional - I see that it's a migration > capabiltiy for the migration socket, and a flag in nbd - so it only > yanks things you've told it to. IIUC, you have to set these flags upfront when you launch QEMU, or hotplug the device using the feature. When something gets stuck, and you issue the "yank" command, then everything that has the flag enabled gets torn down. So in practice it looks like the flag will get enabled for everything at QEMU startup, and yanking down tear down everything. > > eg if a chardev hangs QEMU, and we tear down everything, killing the NBD > > connection used for the guest disk, we needlessly break I/O. > > > > eg doing this in the chardev backend is not desirable, because the bugs > > with hanging QEMU are typically caused by the way the frontend device > > uses the chardev blocking I/O calls, instead of non-blocking I/O calls. > > > > Having a way to get out of any of these problems from a single point is > quite nice. To be useful in COLO you need to know for sure you can get > out of any network screwup. > > We already use shutdown(2) in migrate_cancel and migrate-pause for > basically the same reason; I don't think we've got anything similar for > NBD, and we probably should have (I think I asked for it fairly > recently). Yes, the migrate_cancel is an example of a more fine grained way to recover. I was thinking that we need an equivalent fine control knob for NBD too. That way if QEMU does get stuck, you can start by tearing down the least distruptive channel. eg try tearing down the migration connection first (which shouldn't negatively impact the guest), and only if that doesn't work then, move on to tear down the NBD connection (which risks data loss) Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|